VITAL Logo
Virtual Initiatives for Technology, Teaching & Learning
 
Navigation Bar VITAL HomePageAbout VITAL Projects FundingResourcesEventsContactsPI Forms

University of Wisconsin System PK-16 Grants
Teacher Quality Initiative
2005-2006 Academic Year

Request for Proposals
Due February 11, 2005

The University of Wisconsin System Administration is seeking proposals to support campus activities that will advance the successful implementation of PI 34 and delivery of quality educational preparation programs built upon a foundation of all university responsibility and broad-based collaboration. Funding will support activities related to the initial preparation and/or on-going professional development of teachers and based on your planning/pilot work conducted during the 2004-2005 academic year.

Each of the thirteen University of Wisconsin baccalaureate institutions is eligible to receive funding during this competitive phase. Applications representing multiple UW institutions are highly encouraged. Single campus applicants can request funds in the $30,000-$60,000 range for each year of the project (see Project Duration section for details). Applications representing multiple campuses should consider this range as a guideline for their budget request (i.e., an application representing two campuses should not exceed $120,000 per year for their budget). We anticipate funding four single campus projects and two multiple campus projects.

Grant activities must explicitly address essential components related to 1) the implementation of PI 34 http://www.dpi.state.wi.us/dpi/dlsis/tel/watsnew.html and 2) the UW System Board of Regents Resolutions I.1.b http://vital.wisconsin.edu/principles/summary.htm and I.1.e http://vital.wisconsin.edu/principles/fullreport.htm. These resolutions and associated principles direct institutions to “…assume responsibility at the all-university level for teacher quality and work in partnership with PK-12 and other postsecondary leaders toward school renewal.”

Grant activities must involve faculty and/or staff from education and letters and sciences. Additional collaboration within your campus (e.g., outreach/continuing education extension), LEAs, CESAs, and other postsecondary institutions (e.g., UW Colleges; Technical Colleges; independent/private colleges and universities) should serve to complement your implementation goals.

The likelihood of funding will be enhanced if proposals integrate other relevant System initiatives and include strategies for sustaining project outcomes.

Proposals are due on or before February 11, 2005 (postmarked or electronically submitted) for projects that will be funded during the fiscal year 2005-2006.*

Project Duration

Applicants may request project funding for up to two years (2005-2006 and 2006-2007). Single campus proposals budgets should not exceed $60,000 per year; multi-institutional proposals should not exceed $60,000 per year, per campus.

Multi-year proposals are expected to provide a coordinated plan of activities for the two years, rather than repeating an annual project. Exceptions to this requirement would include innovative, pilot projects that expand capacity served during year two. Funding for second year activities will be dependent on demonstrating sufficient progress toward completing the project's outcomes, the timely submittal of all reports, and system funding availability. (See Forms and Reports for progress reporting information.)

Requirements for Application

To be considered for funding, a proposal must:
1. Articulate well-defined, measurable outcomes that advance specific components of PI 34 and the delivery of quality educational preparation programs built upon a foundation of all-university responsibility and broad-based collaboration;
2. Have the potential to be replicable at other institutions; and
3. Employ sound evaluation measures.

Project Enhancements

In addition to the requirements listed above, applications will be enhanced if proposals address the following components:
1. Specific strategies for sustaining outcomes beyond funding period, including exploration of extramural funding
2. Integration of other relevant System priorities
(e.g., Scholarship of Teaching and Learning ,
Race and Ethnicity ,
Curricular Redesign ,
Women’s Issues ,
Technology and Learning ,
and/or Work/Life Issues ),
3. Collaboration with UW Colleges (this is particularly relevant for institutions where there are significant enrollments from regional UW Colleges).

Proposal Components

I. Cover Page. All Provosts and other partners (such as school district and/or CESA administrators) must sign multi-institutional proposals. (Please note: If you are submitting your proposal electronically, you must mail or fax the cover page with the necessary signatures.)

II. Abstract. Maximum length: one double-spaced page.

III. Project Narrative. Maximum length: seven double-spaced pages, with a minimum
10 point font.*

Please note that reviewers will evaluate proposals based on these sections. The number of points allocated to each section is noted. Points will be used by reviewers to score proposals and make recommendations concerning funding.

The narrative must include the following sections:

A. Statement of Need/Problem (10 points). The proposal must clearly describe a problem/issue related to the professional development of teachers (pre-service and/or in-service). The nature and extent of the partnership between Letters and Sciences and Education, as well as between the UW institution(s) and PK-12 schools or CESAs and/or other post-secondary institutions, must be explained. Briefly describe how actions taken during the planning phase of the grant process led to the emergence of this need/problem. For example, if a needs assessment was conducted during the planning phase provide a summary of the data.

B. Description of Project Outcomes and Activities (40 points). Clearly identify the intended outcomes of the project and detail the grant activities consistent with these outcomes. Outcomes should be specific, measurable, attainable and timely. Indicate how the proposed project will relate to and enhance existing efforts. If applicable, describe the innovative and/or experimental nature of the project. Describe the nature of and reasons for the specific collaborative partners (i.e., describe how partners will enhance activities associated with planning, implementation and evaluation).

Project outcomes should demonstrate knowledge of PI 34 requirements and relevant
UW System Board of Regents resolutions. Note: Due to the complexity of these mandates, it is not possible to identify a set of common practices as hallmarks or quality indicators. As part of the proposal however, each campus should specify how the outcomes and related activities would serve to advance quality teacher preparation within an environment of all-university responsibility and collaboration.

C. Workplan Overview (10 points). Include a work plan that lists all major activities that will serve to advance the stated outcome(s). Include a realistic timeline and identify (by name and/or position, the individual who will lead/facilitate each of the activities. For proposals requesting two-years of funding, include activities and timeline for the 2005-2007 funding period.

D. Assessment/Evaluation (20 points). Include a detailed plan for assessing project outcomes as well as evaluating the efficacy of major activities. The evaluation plan should include formative and summative assessments. The use of an outside evaluator is highly encouraged and may be supported by project funds.

E. Dissemination (5 points). Describe how you plan to communicate your progress and outcomes within your institution, the UW System, and to PK-12 schools. Grant recipients must develop and maintain a worldwide website of project activities. Project web pages will be linked to the UW System VIT2AL website vital.wisconsin.edu/projects. Grant recipients will be required to attend a workshop of project coordinators (travel and expenses to be covered by UW System).

IV. Budget and Budget Narrative (15 points). The attached budget form must be used for all proposals (do not use your own form). Please note that there are different forms for the doctoral institutions and the non-doctoral institutions.

You must also include a budget narrative (maximum length: two pages double-spaced, with a minimum 10 point font). For each year funds are requested, clearly describe and justify each item of the budget in relation to the proposal. For example, if you include release time for faculty and/or staff, explain their activities during the funding period.

Funds may be requested for the following expenses:

• UW faculty/staff release time, overload, or summer contracts (include fringe benefits for UW faculty and staff)
• Compensation for collaborative partners (e.g., PK-12 teachers, postsecondary representatives, CESA staff) for such activities as program development, planning and instruction (contract buy-out, overload, or substitute teachers. Do not include fringe benefits for non-UW employees)
• Student help, graduate assistants (include fringe benefits for UW support staff)
• Travel for planning meetings and dissemination
• Software, supplies and expenses
• Capital equipment and hardware in support of the project
• An external evaluator

Funds may not be requested to provide stipends to teachers to participate in the project’s professional development programs (except during the summer when teachers are not under contract with the school district). Funds may not be requested to waive tuition and fees for university credit courses or to pay tuition for student project assistants. Institutional match is not required.

V. Vitae For the project director only, please provide a condensed, one-page curriculum vitae.

VI. Letters of Support (optional).

Review Process

A review team consisting of representatives from UW institutions, UW System Administration, CESA, school districts, and the Department of Public Instruction will assess the proposals and make funding recommendations to the Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs, UW System Administration.

Forms and Reports

A list of all forms can be obtained at the following URL vital.wisconsin.edu/admin/index.html

For single year projects, a year-end report form must be submitted by August 1, 2006. Project Directors may submit year-end reports using the online report form or may submit the form in hard copy.
For multi-year projects, to request second year funding for the 2006-2007 academic year, Project Directors will submit a progress report and budget request no later than
February 11, 2006. The report must contain the following information:

1. A cover page.
2. A description of project activities completed to date.
3. A preliminary evaluation of completed project activities and outcomes.
4. An explanation of how project funds have been expended and how new funds would be used. Explain any changes from the original project outcomes, activities, budget, and/or partners, including the rationale for any changes from the original proposal.
5. A description of the activities and budget planned for the second year.
6. The URL of the website created to showcase your work.
7. A budget form.

Report length should not exceed three double-spaced pages, with a minimum 10-point font.

Timeline

November 19, 2004 UW System Administration sends 2005-2006 grant application RFP to institutions.

February 11, 2005 Institutions submit competitive proposals (for 2005-2006) to UW System Administration.*

March 15, 2005 UW System Administration notifies institutions of competitive grant awards (for 2005-2006 funding period).

August 1, 2005 Year-end reports due to UW System of 2004-2005 activities.

February 10, 2006 Institutions submit competitive proposals or progress report for multi-year funded projects (for 2006-2007) to UW System Administration.*

August 1, 2006 Year-end reports due to UW System of 2005-2006 activities.

August 1, 2006 Final reports due to UW System for single year funded projects.

August 1, 2007 Final reports due to UW System for multi-year funded projects.

Submission Guidelines

Proposals must be received in our office or electronically submitted no later than
February 11, 2005.

For paper submission, send cover page, budget form with narrative and proposal and seven photocopies to the person listed as contact below. Hand delivered proposals must be received at the same location by 4:00 p.m. on the deadline date.

For e-mail submissions, send cover page, budget form with narrative and proposal to: vital@uwsa.edu. One original of the cover must be mailed postmarked by February 11, 2005.

All proposals received will be the property of UW System. Proposals submitted after the deadline date will not be considered. Applicants are responsible for obtaining their campus approval of proposals in time to meet the UW System deadline.

Contact
Dr. Francine Tompkins, Director
PK-16 Initiatives
UW System Academic and Student Services
1632 Van Hise Hall
1220 Linden Drive
Madison, WI 53706
608-262-5464
608-263-2046 Fax
ftompkins@uwsa.edu

* Principal investigators are encouraged to check with their university’s research administration office for other institutional deadlines or requirements that might apply.


HOME | ABOUT VIT 2 AL | PROJECTS | FUNDING | RESOURCES | EVENTS | CONTACT | PI FORMS

 


University of Wisconsin Extension Copyright © 2001 University of Wisconsin System Board of Regents University of Wisconsin System

The VIT 2 AL web site was last updated in December 2005